Suggested Articles
Search found 308 matches
- Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:29 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Add "Digitally Sign" Column To Files And Folders View
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5597
- Jump to post
Re: Add "Digitally Sign" Column To Files And Folders View
Thanks Dan, I knew about those. But when your project is over 50+ files and we add files every few months it would still be nice to scroll down the "Files, Folders" pane to see if I missed any (because of being distracted, or just forgetting). Just my 2 cents
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:29 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Add "Digitally Sign" Column To Files And Folders View
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5597
- Jump to post
Add "Digitally Sign" Column To Files And Folders View
It would be helpful to have "Digitally Sign?" as a selectable column in the Files And Folders view to easily scan any DLLs/EXEs I might have missed.
- Thu Oct 27, 2016 9:13 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Workaround for the "Could not access network location" error
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8655
- Jump to post
Re: Workaround for the "Could not access network location" error
Running into this today. The situation gets worse because in my scenario the property based folder, and the file we are installing in it, needs to be accessed optionally only when a specific version of Adobe Acrobat is installed. e.g. ADOBE_INSTALL_PATH <-- property based folder name | +--- plug_ins
- Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:39 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Registering a Dll on a 64bit System
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4866
- Jump to post
Re: Registering a Dll on a 64bit System
Dan,
In a merge module if I mark the 64-bit DLL as a "64-bit component" and select "Register .Net assembly for COM Interoperability" will AI find the 64-bit Regasm tool even though in External Tools I've got "Regasm.exe" pointed to the 32-bit Regasm?
In a merge module if I mark the 64-bit DLL as a "64-bit component" and select "Register .Net assembly for COM Interoperability" will AI find the 64-bit Regasm tool even though in External Tools I've got "Regasm.exe" pointed to the 32-bit Regasm?
- Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:52 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: License Information
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10857
- Jump to post
Re: License Information
Hello Meena, I'm afraid our "Package Serial Validation" feature cannot be used without the "UserRegistrationDlg" dialog. If you want to use your own custom dialogs, then instead of using our built-in "Package Serial Validation" feature you can try to implement a packag...
- Wed Sep 02, 2015 7:22 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Theme Questions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2798
- Jump to post
Theme Questions
I didn't think any of this was possible but I told my management I'd ask :P 1. Can I create a copy of a customized theme and make changes to it then use it in Advanced Installer, e.g. copy "Light Cyan" and make a "Light Cyan 2"? 2. Can a theme be specified on the Advanced Install...
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 7:40 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Does Set Installer Property CA Support Operators?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7330
- Jump to post
Re: Does Set Installer Property CA Support Operators?
It would be cool if this work but as a workaround I made my PARAM checks part of the install/run condition:
(PARAM1 OR PARAM1_64 OR PARAM2 OR PARAM2_64)
and then set the property to "1"
(PARAM1 OR PARAM1_64 OR PARAM2 OR PARAM2_64)
and then set the property to "1"
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 7:28 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Does Set Installer Property CA Support Operators?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7330
- Jump to post
Re: Does Set Installer Property CA Support Operators?
Yes and I ended up getting:
MSI (c) (DC:90) [14:25:04:846]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying CXMY_CITRIX_SERVER property. Its current value is '0'. Its new value: ' AND AND AND 1'.
MSI (c) (DC:90) [14:25:04:846]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying CXMY_CITRIX_SERVER property. Its current value is '0'. Its new value: ' AND AND AND 1'.
- Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:39 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Hiding sensitive property in MSI log used in a Custom Action
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5474
- Jump to post
Re: Hiding sensitive property in MSI log used in a Custom Ac
I also set the 8192 bit in the type table for the custom action:
Maybe that wasn't the correct place?
This MSI Help isn't that clear:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/librar ... 85%29.aspx
Maybe I need to set the 8192 bit here as well? :
- obfuscate.JPG (19.48 KiB) Viewed 5473 times
This MSI Help isn't that clear:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/librar ... 85%29.aspx
Maybe I need to set the 8192 bit here as well? :
- obfuscate2.JPG (16.11 KiB) Viewed 5473 times
- Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:30 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Hiding sensitive property in MSI log used in a Custom Action
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5474
- Jump to post
Hiding sensitive property in MSI log used in a Custom Action
I have a "Call function from attached DLL" custom action that runs CreateExeProcess. The Action Data contains a password I want to hide in the MSI Log. I've gotten rid of most instances by: a) using a property to hold the value and marking it as "Hide Property". b) Adding the ass...
- Thu May 28, 2015 2:13 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: License Information
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10857
- Jump to post
Re: License Information
Hi Daniel, Once you create a SKU (serial number) in an Installer to turn on a feature I'm assuming ANYONE who runs my installer, with that SKU, will get that feature turned on, meaning SKUs could be shared between end users? I was looking to make SKUs unique between customers, like maybe using a tem...
- Wed May 27, 2015 9:58 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: License Information
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10857
- Jump to post
Re: License Information
Daniel,
Anyway to do this but make the SKUs unique, e.g. with a customer code, so that customers can't share SKUs?
Anyway to do this but make the SKUs unique, e.g. with a customer code, so that customers can't share SKUs?
- Mon May 18, 2015 11:06 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Shortcut Not Pointing To Correct Manufacturer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3717
- Jump to post
Re: Shortcut Not Pointing To Correct Manufacturer
Dan, we found the issue. The shortcut dir setting was hard-coded on the Install Parameters page.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Fri May 15, 2015 4:42 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Predefined Detect Service Custom Action Use Formatted
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4162
- Jump to post
Predefined Detect Service Custom Action Use Formatted
It would be nice if the predefined Detect Service custom action supported Formatted Type for the Service Name field.
Everywhere else in my merge module I use a property containing the service name other than Detect Service.
Everywhere else in my merge module I use a property containing the service name other than Detect Service.
- Mon May 11, 2015 4:04 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Shortcut Not Pointing To Correct Manufacturer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3717
- Jump to post
Shortcut Not Pointing To Correct Manufacturer
I'm passing in the Manufacturer property via command line build to one of our AI installers. Seems like the SET_SHORTCUTDIR action though has a cached reference to Manufacturer we use as a default in the installer. I can't seem to track down where this is coming from. Here's the detailed log snippet...