Hello Catalin,
thank you for your investigation.
Based on that, my wild guess here would be that your certificate does not have a private key, therefore it is not detected by our search (in the latest versions of Advanced Installer). Could you please check this and confirm that this is the case ...
Suggested Articles
Search found 38 matches
- Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:00 am
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: "Digital Signature - Personal certificate store" - Empty Dropdown
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5716
- Jump to post
- Fri Nov 22, 2019 7:32 am
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: "Digital Signature - Personal certificate store" - Empty Dropdown
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5716
- Jump to post
Re: "Digital Signature - Personal certificate store" - Empty Dropdown
Hello,
thank you for your response.
I've just sent you the requested log file.
thank you for your response.
I've just sent you the requested log file.
- Wed Nov 20, 2019 2:58 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: "Digital Signature - Personal certificate store" - Empty Dropdown
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5716
- Jump to post
"Digital Signature - Personal certificate store" - Empty Dropdown
Hi,
last week I noticed that the dropdown list of the "certificate store" is empty and I'm unable to select my certificate from my usb token/dongle.
So I installed some older versions of AdvancedInstaller and in version 15.6 I'm able to select my certificate. I don't know where between the version ...
last week I noticed that the dropdown list of the "certificate store" is empty and I'm unable to select my certificate from my usb token/dongle.
So I installed some older versions of AdvancedInstaller and in version 15.6 I'm able to select my certificate. I don't know where between the version ...
- Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:00 am
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: "Upgrades" - Uninstall old Prerequisites
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18053
- Jump to post
Re: "Upgrades" - Uninstall old Prerequisites
Hi Eusebiu,
thank you for your response.
Your information about the sequence when this happens is the key. I thought the "Upgrades"-action are done after the prerequisites and _before_ the main installation. I've added the ADE as a feature based prerequisite.
Is there a way to change the order of ...
thank you for your response.
Your information about the sequence when this happens is the key. I thought the "Upgrades"-action are done after the prerequisites and _before_ the main installation. I've added the ADE as a feature based prerequisite.
Is there a way to change the order of ...
- Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:16 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: "Upgrades" - Uninstall old Prerequisites
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18053
- Jump to post
"Upgrades" - Uninstall old Prerequisites
Hi,
for our new major version of our product I added some updated prerequisites (Access Database Engine 2016). In that order I want to de-/uninstall an old prerequisite (Access Database Engine 2010).
So I searched in the forum and found, that the "Upgrades"-Page is exatly what I want and need. "ADE ...
for our new major version of our product I added some updated prerequisites (Access Database Engine 2016). In that order I want to de-/uninstall an old prerequisite (Access Database Engine 2010).
So I searched in the forum and found, that the "Upgrades"-Page is exatly what I want and need. "ADE ...
- Fri Apr 15, 2016 4:28 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: some suggestions for features
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7903
- Jump to post
Re: some suggestions for features
Hey Eusebiu,
are there already some plans for the "Test wizard/function" (<- suggestion/improvment!) ? this would make the "do i set everthing right, let's see" work so much easier ....
As you can read in the original post (see link in the first post), I've to check several installed versions of ...
are there already some plans for the "Test wizard/function" (<- suggestion/improvment!) ? this would make the "do i set everthing right, let's see" work so much easier ....
As you can read in the original post (see link in the first post), I've to check several installed versions of ...
- Wed Dec 23, 2015 4:55 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
- Replies: 7
- Views: 38766
- Jump to post
Re: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
Thank you for your help Daniel, that was the solution.
I think an additional fault of mine was that I sometimes not explicitly saved (and sometimes re-opened) the project, so searched doesn't recognize my changes that I made.
Only for completeness:
I created two searches. At both searches I checked ...
I think an additional fault of mine was that I sometimes not explicitly saved (and sometimes re-opened) the project, so searched doesn't recognize my changes that I made.
Only for completeness:
I created two searches. At both searches I checked ...
- Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:25 am
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
- Replies: 7
- Views: 38766
- Jump to post
Re: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
Is there something new about the problem? 
Or am I doing something wrong?
Need more information / help?
Or am I doing something wrong?
Need more information / help?
- Tue Dec 15, 2015 11:49 am
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
- Replies: 7
- Views: 38766
- Jump to post
Re: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
Hi Bogdan,
thank you for your reply.
Thank you for the hint with "Wow6432Node" but that's not the problem, that was only a sample/try to solve my problem.
Unlike the normal MSI installation, the C2R creates the "Wow6432Node" not between "\SOFTWARE\" and "\Microsoft\" (like "HLKM\SOFTWARE ...
thank you for your reply.
Thank you for the hint with "Wow6432Node" but that's not the problem, that was only a sample/try to solve my problem.
Unlike the normal MSI installation, the C2R creates the "Wow6432Node" not between "\SOFTWARE\" and "\Microsoft\" (like "HLKM\SOFTWARE ...
- Mon Dec 14, 2015 3:05 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
- Replies: 7
- Views: 38766
- Jump to post
Detect Office 2013 / 2016 as Click-To-Run installation
Hi,
we've an AddIn for Microsoft Visio. I already have some CustomSearches (Custom Behaviour - Searches) for Visio 2010/2013 (x86 and x64) which work quite well for an MSI installation.
For this searches I checked the registry key "InstalledVersion" under "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Visio" and ...
we've an AddIn for Microsoft Visio. I already have some CustomSearches (Custom Behaviour - Searches) for Visio 2010/2013 (x86 and x64) which work quite well for an MSI installation.
For this searches I checked the registry key "InstalledVersion" under "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Visio" and ...
- Fri Dec 04, 2015 10:24 am
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: How to use variables in Pre-Build Events
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5127
- Jump to post
How to use variables in Pre-Build Events
Hi,
I already have read about that it is not possible to change images for the prerequisite dialogs from the GUI. So I created a pre-build event for that and copy/replace for each build the pictures with the original under "C:\Program Files (x86)\Caphyon\Advanced Installer 12.5.1\themes\graphite ...
I already have read about that it is not possible to change images for the prerequisite dialogs from the GUI. So I created a pre-build event for that and copy/replace for each build the pictures with the original under "C:\Program Files (x86)\Caphyon\Advanced Installer 12.5.1\themes\graphite ...
- Wed Jun 24, 2015 12:32 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
- Replies: 24
- Views: 23042
- Jump to post
Re: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
Hi,
thank you for your reply, I think my big problems are solved.
But (hopefully last) questions about the bootstrapper error:
1. Our project was started in version 8.0.2, is there a missing conversion, because I never had this error. And I builded the project several times the last days with v12 ...
thank you for your reply, I think my big problems are solved.
But (hopefully last) questions about the bootstrapper error:
1. Our project was started in version 8.0.2, is there a missing conversion, because I never had this error. And I builded the project several times the last days with v12 ...
- Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:41 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
- Replies: 24
- Views: 23042
- Jump to post
Re: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
ok, maybe now.... (your hint with the "dialogs"-page)
I want handle some sub-features always by conditions (they are always "Not Displayed") IDEPENDET of the SetupType ("Typical", "Custom" and "Complete", that's it what you mean as "Installation Behavior"?):
if I set "Not installed" and a ...
I want handle some sub-features always by conditions (they are always "Not Displayed") IDEPENDET of the SetupType ("Typical", "Custom" and "Complete", that's it what you mean as "Installation Behavior"?):
if I set "Not installed" and a ...
- Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:11 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
- Replies: 24
- Views: 23042
- Jump to post
Re: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
Additional:
Searches (at Win7x86 with Visio 2013 x86 installed)
VISIO2010X86: ''
VISIO2013X86: '15.0.4420.1017'
VISIO2013X64: '15.0.4420.1017'
see attachments: the one should be installed, and the other not!, AI tries to install both and as result I get a mix of both...
Searches (at Win7x86 with Visio 2013 x86 installed)
VISIO2010X86: ''
VISIO2013X86: '15.0.4420.1017'
VISIO2013X64: '15.0.4420.1017'
see attachments: the one should be installed, and the other not!, AI tries to install both and as result I get a mix of both...
- Tue Jun 23, 2015 12:15 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
- Replies: 24
- Views: 23042
- Jump to post
Re: Set AppDir based on CustomSearch and OS-type
Hey!
Do you mean that through this option the search should not be performed on a 32-bit machine? Can you give me more details about what the option should do and why do you need it, so we can better evaluate it?
Exactly what you write, something like this
2015-06-23 12_46_44-Clipboard.png
My ...
Do you mean that through this option the search should not be performed on a 32-bit machine? Can you give me more details about what the option should do and why do you need it, so we can better evaluate it?
Exactly what you write, something like this
2015-06-23 12_46_44-Clipboard.png
My ...