Suggested Articles
Search found 25 matches
- Sat Jul 18, 2020 11:13 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: GitHub Integration - Auto-Updater
- Replies: 18
- Views: 56574
- Jump to post
Re: GitHub Integration - Auto-Updater
I'm however trying to set it up and I can't seem to get it to work and the documentation is pretty vague for this feature https://www.advancedinstaller.com/user-guide/qa-github-updater-integration.html#qa-github-updater-integration
The first step in the documentation says:
1. Set "Updates ...
- Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:14 am
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Problem localizing EULA with Professional version 11.4.1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4120
- Jump to post
Re: Problem localizing EULA with Professional version 11.4.1
Hi,
Sorry for delay in checking back. I can confirm, that it works once I add multiple languages.
So there doesn't seem to be any issue. Everything works.
Kalle
Sorry for delay in checking back. I can confirm, that it works once I add multiple languages.
So there doesn't seem to be any issue. Everything works.
Kalle
- Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:25 am
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: Problem localizing EULA with Professional version 11.4.1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4120
- Jump to post
Problem localizing EULA with Professional version 11.4.1
Hi,
Edit: During writing this post I discovered that I can Localize EULA on 11.2, but not on 11.4.1. I left the description on how I ended up bit confused, and where I did find the final issue.
Old problem:
I need to localize EULA and I'm using Pro version. I've tried following up to this article ...
Edit: During writing this post I discovered that I can Localize EULA on 11.2, but not on 11.4.1. I left the description on how I ended up bit confused, and where I did find the final issue.
Old problem:
I need to localize EULA and I'm using Pro version. I've tried following up to this article ...
- Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:22 am
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7372
- Jump to post
Re: Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
Hi,
Thanks for pointing this out!
I hear you about the syncing side-effects. I carefully tested that they do not cause issues with our case (so far). However we do have VSTO registration, so there is/was valid concern of whether the VSTO manifest gets "unbound" from any registration activities ...
Thanks for pointing this out!
I hear you about the syncing side-effects. I carefully tested that they do not cause issues with our case (so far). However we do have VSTO registration, so there is/was valid concern of whether the VSTO manifest gets "unbound" from any registration activities ...
- Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:20 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7372
- Jump to post
Re: Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
Thanks for confirming this :-).
The thing is, if I perform following:
- Checkout AIP file from version control
- Perform ANY dirty tricks to fix the path to be known build drop location
- Perform versioning and other tweaks
- Checkin AIP file to version control
=> Perform setup build...
I have ...
The thing is, if I perform following:
- Checkout AIP file from version control
- Perform ANY dirty tricks to fix the path to be known build drop location
- Perform versioning and other tweaks
- Checkin AIP file to version control
=> Perform setup build...
I have ...
- Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:50 pm
- Forum: Building Installers
- Topic: Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7372
- Jump to post
Dynamic/changing sync folder source name?
Hi,
I have a process where I want to be able to parametrize the sync folder source. The case is as following:
1. We have consistently named automatic build artifacts, on folders such as:
BuildName_20140610.1
BuildName_20140612.1
BuildName_20140616.1
BuildName_20140616.2
Within each build there ...
I have a process where I want to be able to parametrize the sync folder source. The case is as following:
1. We have consistently named automatic build artifacts, on folders such as:
BuildName_20140610.1
BuildName_20140612.1
BuildName_20140616.1
BuildName_20140616.2
Within each build there ...
- Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:19 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater \silent parameter with -nofreqcheck
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9682
- Jump to post
Re: Updater \silent parameter with -nofreqcheck
Hi!
Thank you Cosmin. Can you confirm if this feature made it to the 7.2 version; I didn't find any mention in the command line options on the helps, so suspecting it might have not made it that fast.
Br,
Kalle
Thank you Cosmin. Can you confirm if this feature made it to the 7.2 version; I didn't find any mention in the command line options on the helps, so suspecting it might have not made it that fast.
Br,
Kalle
- Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:04 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Re: Updater block until install complete
Hello!
My contribution as a command line parametrizable C# implementation:
It is then launched within command set (copy is to prevent installation blocking as it updates the UpdaterStarter.exe as well).
copy bin\UpdaterStarter.exe .
UpdaterStarter.exe acupdate.exe "/silentall -nofreqcheck"
<and ...
My contribution as a command line parametrizable C# implementation:
It is then launched within command set (copy is to prevent installation blocking as it updates the UpdaterStarter.exe as well).
copy bin\UpdaterStarter.exe .
UpdaterStarter.exe acupdate.exe "/silentall -nofreqcheck"
<and ...
- Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:36 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater \silent parameter with -nofreqcheck
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9682
- Jump to post
Re: Updater \silent parameter with -nofreqcheck
Hi!
We would need the same functionality in a way that the updater would return result code based on if there are updates or not. The /checknow -minuseraction starts to update with dialog; we need simply status so that we can exit our application cycle and launch the blocking updater + application ...
We would need the same functionality in a way that the updater would return result code based on if there are updates or not. The /checknow -minuseraction starts to update with dialog; we need simply status so that we can exit our application cycle and launch the blocking updater + application ...
- Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:42 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Re: Updater block until install complete
Actually... simpler solution would allow updater not to exit after downloading.
The script could copy the updater and it's ini file to %TEMP% before starting, that would allow updater to update itself as well without having to restart (and cause the process to exit).
Initially that sounds like ...
The script could copy the updater and it's ini file to %TEMP% before starting, that would allow updater to update itself as well without having to restart (and cause the process to exit).
Initially that sounds like ...
- Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:02 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Re: Updater block until install complete
Hi!
Few points that raise:
1. Shouldn't the startupdate.exe also call itself "away" so that it doesn't block the update?
2. The mutex call requires bit more explanation for my taste; does the updater reserve the mutex so that the startupdater.exe can handle it?
3. Why wouldn't you provide ...
Few points that raise:
1. Shouldn't the startupdate.exe also call itself "away" so that it doesn't block the update?
2. The mutex call requires bit more explanation for my taste; does the updater reserve the mutex so that the startupdater.exe can handle it?
3. Why wouldn't you provide ...
- Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:22 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Re: Updater block until install complete
Hi!
Also confirmed with 7.1.3... the updater pends until it is done downloading, but then when the actual installation starts, the updater exits.
Br,
Kalle
Also confirmed with 7.1.3... the updater pends until it is done downloading, but then when the actual installation starts, the updater exits.
Br,
Kalle
- Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:38 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Re: Updater block until install complete
Hi!
I have following script (cmd file) that gets run on user login (that's autologin after reboot):
acupdate.exe /silentall -nofreqcheck
shutdown -r -f -t 900
bin\AutomationConsole.exe poll
Basically it starts to install, but also proceeds with the script so that the exe is running way before it ...
I have following script (cmd file) that gets run on user login (that's autologin after reboot):
acupdate.exe /silentall -nofreqcheck
shutdown -r -f -t 900
bin\AutomationConsole.exe poll
Basically it starts to install, but also proceeds with the script so that the exe is running way before it ...
- Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:03 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Updater block until install complete
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10814
- Jump to post
Updater block until install complete
Hi!
I'd like to see a command line option added, that would allow updater to block until the update has installed (if it found any).
I might be missing something, but I see it bit tricky to implement simple automated script (for us its an independent self rebooted/restarted console app, that we ...
I'd like to see a command line option added, that would allow updater to block until the update has installed (if it found any).
I might be missing something, but I see it bit tricky to implement simple automated script (for us its an independent self rebooted/restarted console app, that we ...
- Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:45 pm
- Forum: Common Problems
- Topic: using Advanced Installer for just the bootstrapper setup.exe
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4558
- Jump to post
Re: using Advanced Installer for just the bootstrapper setup.exe
Hi!
I have bumped to similar need, coming from the requirement to get silent MSI installations for 3rd party MSI packages. The prerequisite and other stuff would be handy to do within the bootstrapper.
I believe InstallShield in fact supports (-r) option for recording the installation answers and ...
I have bumped to similar need, coming from the requirement to get silent MSI installations for 3rd party MSI packages. The prerequisite and other stuff would be handy to do within the bootstrapper.
I believe InstallShield in fact supports (-r) option for recording the installation answers and ...