- Why do I receive the "Error: Update installation failed. Some of the updates failed to install properly" message?
- Why the installation fails with the "No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" error?
- Why do I receive the "Another version of this product is already installed" message?
- Why do one or more files disappear after an upgrade is performed?
- How do I determine if an Upgrade is being performed?
- What is the value of the UILevel property in a package that is upgraded by a newer version?
- What do I do if the certificate used in LUA patching has already expired?
- Why does the upgrade installation fail?
- How do I remove the old version when using the fourth field of the Product Version?
- Why a 32-bit setup fails to upgrade an old 64-bit setup on Windows 7
Why do I receive the "Error: Update installation failed. Some of the updates failed to install properly" message?
Any update defined in the Updates Configuration file uses a detection criteria. This criteria is usually a file or a registry entry which contains the package version. If it's not met after the update is installed, the Updater will show this message. Therefore, you need to make sure you specified a correct file or registry entry in the Installed Detection tab of the Update Properties page.
Why the installation fails with the "No mapping between account names and security IDs was done" error?
This error may occur during installation if you configured the updater to run Automatic: using a Windows scheduled task and further updates will be installed silently through updater's support service.
In this case the Updater will install all the update packages under System account. However, the Updater scheduled task is like this:
- User: [%UserDomain]\[LogonUser]
- Run only if this user is logged on: checked
Please note this is a wrong configuration because at updates install time the User will be set to System. In this case, the scheduled task installation will fail because the "Run only if this user is logged on" flag cannot be set for "System" account.
To avoid this issue, in the project file configure the scheduled task of your Updater to be installed under "System" account. Just go to Account tab and leave the User field empty (just delete the existing [%USERDOMAIN]\[LogonUser]" references).
Why do I receive the "Another version of this product is already installed" message?
Usually, this message is showed if you created a package, installed it, modified its contents and then you tried to install it again without uninstalling the original one. Basically, Windows Installer can upgrade the original package only if the modified one has a higher version and a different Product Code. If you don't want to create a new version of the package, you need to uninstall the original MSI before installing the modified one. However, if you want to create a new version which will upgrade the old one, you can follow the steps explained in the Upgrades article.
This error can only occur on development machines during the installer's authoring process. You needn't consider preventing it on clients' machines.
Why do one or more files disappear after an upgrade is performed?
This behavior is caused by a Windows Installer bug which appears when a file needs to be upgraded with itself and the version of the file is the same or lower in the upgrading package.
For example a file from the old package (already installed) has version 2.0.0, but this file has version 1.5.0 in the new upgrading package. In this case, during upgrade, the enginge detects file version 2.0.0 on the target machine and skips version 1.5.0 installation. Then, in the next phase it completely removes file version 2.0.0 along with the old package from the target machine.
The solution is to increase the version of the file from the upgrading project or set the Always overwrite existing file option in the File Operations Tab of the "Edit File" dialog.
How do I determine if an Upgrade is being performed?
An upgrade process can be detected by using two properties:
- OLDPRODUCTS - this property is set in the upgrading MSI if the package found an older version installed on the target machine
- UPGRADINGPRODUCTCODE - this property is set in the MSI which is being upgraded if the package is uninstalled by a newer version
What is the value of the UILevel property in a package that is upgraded by a newer version?
The UILevel property in a package that is being upgraded by a newer version is set to the value of the UI used during the upgrade process. During an upgrade, the old version is removed silently and you may expect the UILevel property's value being 2 but this is not happening.
What do I do if the certificate used in LUA patching has already expired?
If the certificate used for LUA patching has already expired there are a few options that you can try, although none of them are guaranteed to work:
- Alter Windows Installer security policy using Group Policy. In HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Installer create 2 REG_DWORD keys, AllowLockdownPatch and AllowLockdownBrowse, and set their values to 1.
This will allow non-administrators users to run signed and unsigned patches. Subsequent patches can be run by non-administrators even when AllowLockdownPatch and AllowLockdownBrowse permissions have been revoked. This option may not be viable if you have no control over your customers’ security policy.
- Run a patch that has been signed with the new certificate while logged in as an administrator. Both the MSI file and the Patch must be signed with the same certificate. This may not be a viable option if admin permissions for your users cannot be obtained.
- Start a new patch family. This option has the same downsides as the above option due to the need for administrator rights.
- On your build machine, turn the computer’s clock back to prior to the expiry date of the expired certificate.
This option should not work due to the use of a time stamp server but in some occasions it does. After you have turned the clock back simply create an MSI file and patch, signing them both with the expired certificate. Once these steps have been completed you will be able to create subsequent patches with the renewed certificate and LUA patching will work. For more information please read the How to renew a certificate for LUA Patching article.
Why does the upgrade installation fail?
An upgrade installation consists in two parts:
- the uninstall of the old product version
- the installation of the new product version
So, during an upgrade the installation could fail due to an error triggered either by the old version uninstall or by the new version installation. The best way to isolate an upgrade error is by creating a verbose log and, then by analyzing the verbose log.
Here are some common mistakes you should avoid when creating an upgrade installation project:
- Do not update only the fourth field of the Product Version. The
fourth field of the Product Version is ignored by Windows
Installer when comparing product versions. This is why you
should make sure the first three fields of your upgraded
Product Version have an increased version than those of your
old Product Version.
When the first three fields of the old and upgraded Product Version are identical, then the upgrade installation will either fail with "Another version of this product is already installed" message or will be installed side by side with the old version (when using different Product Codes).
- Do not manually change the Upgrade Code. If the old and upgraded version of your product have different Upgrade Codes they will be treated as different product families. Therefore the upgrade installation won't remove the old version, but it will be installed side by side with the old one.
- Do not change the installation type between the old and upgraded version. This is because a per-user installation cannot upgrade a per-machine installation and vice versa. So, you should always make sure that your old and upgraded version have the same installation type.
How do I remove the old version when using the fourth field of the Product Version?
Note that Windows Installer uses only the first three
fields of the Product
Version. If you include a fourth field in the product
version, the installer ignores it.
For details, please check the ProductVersion article.
However, the previous installed version can still be removed, although only the fourth field from the product version is increased, by following these steps:
- Go to the Upgrades page and enable the Customize Advanced Installer upgrade rules option;
- Double-click on the Advanced Installer rule that is related to the [OLDPRODUCTS] property;
- In the Product Info tab, enable the Include maximum version in range option and click OK;
Why a 32-bit setup fails to upgrade an old 64-bit setup on Windows 7
This odd behavior can occur on a Windows 7 machine when the new setup is a 32-bit installation package and the old installed setup is a 64-bit installation package. Although the entry of the old version is properly removed from the Programs and Features list, its resources are not removed. The remove operation is incorrectly redirected to the Program Files (x86) folder, which is wrong as it should be removing the 64-bit files of the old setup.
The best way to troubleshoot this is to create a verbose log of the installation process. On a Windows 7 machine, you will see that:
Action: RemoveFiles. Removing files MSI (s) Executing op: ProgressTotal(Total=20,Type=1,ByteEquivalent=175000) MSI (s) Executing op: SetTargetFolder(Folder=C:\Program Files (x86)\...\)
while on a different Windows machine (e.g. Windows 8.1) you will see that:
Action: RemoveFiles. Removing files MSI (s) Executing op: ProgressTotal(Total=20,Type=1,ByteEquivalent=175000) MSI (s) Executing op: SetTargetFolder(Folder=C:\Program Files\...\)
In order to remove the resources files of the old 64-bit installation package you can use the Uninstall cleanup option from the Files and Folders view or a custom action that implements this functionality.